Chelsea host Crystal Palace in the Premier League. Chelsea sit comfortably in the top four while Palace are down near the foot of the table, and the gap between the two sides this season has been stark.
It's not just the table, though. Palace have been leaking goals on the road and Chelsea have had their home form interrupted by a few shaky results in cups and Europe, so there's more to unpack before assuming how this one goes.
Analysis updated .
Compare bookmakers
Form pointing in different directions
Chelsea's broader run of 20 matches across all competitions shows 11 wins against six losses, with home performances like the 5-1 win over Bournemouth and the 2-0 victory over Manchester United standing out. There have been bumps too, including a home league defeat to Tottenham.
Chelsea: 20 completed matches; Crystal Palace: 20 completed matches.
Chelsea
- Win
- 55% 11 / 20
- Draw
- 15% 3 / 20
- Loss
- 30% 6 / 20
- Scored
- 47
- Conceded
- 33
- Difference
- +14
Crystal Palace
- Win
- 35% 7 / 20
- Draw
- 15% 3 / 20
- Loss
- 50% 10 / 20
- Scored
- 26
- Conceded
- 36
- Difference
- -10
| League | Home | Away | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premier League | Chelsea | Manchester United | 31.10.2026 | 2-0 |
| League Cup | Liverpool | Chelsea | 28.10.2026 | 1-1 |
| Premier League | Chelsea | Tottenham | 24.10.2026 | 0-2 |
| Premier League | Everton | Chelsea | 17.10.2026 | 0-2 |
| Premier League | Chelsea | Bournemouth | 10.10.2026 | 5-1 |
| Premier League | Brentford | Chelsea | 18.09.2026 | 3-0 |
| Premier League | Chelsea | Hull City | 12.09.2026 | 2-2 |
| League Cup | Chelsea | Leeds | 09.09.2026 | 6-3 |
| Premier League | Arsenal | Chelsea | 06.09.2026 | 2-1 |
| Premier League | Chelsea | Brighton | 30.08.2026 | 4-3 |
| League | Home | Away | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premier League | Tottenham | Crystal Palace | 31.10.2026 | 2-0 |
| League Cup | Fulham | Crystal Palace | 28.10.2026 | 0-1 |
| Premier League | Crystal Palace | Newcastle | 25.10.2026 | 0-2 |
| UEFA Europa League | Beşiktaş | Crystal Palace | 22.10.2026 | 2-2 |
| Premier League | Brighton | Crystal Palace | 18.10.2026 | 5-0 |
| UEFA Europa League | Lyon | Crystal Palace | 15.10.2026 | 3-2 |
| Premier League | Crystal Palace | Nottingham Forest | 11.10.2026 | 3-1 |
| Friendlies Clubs | Crystal Palace | Bristol City | 03.10.2026 | 0-2 |
| Premier League | Leeds | Crystal Palace | 20.09.2026 | 0-0 |
| UEFA Europa League | Crystal Palace | Lech Poznan | 17.09.2026 | 4-0 |
Palace's record over the same number of games is much thinner, just seven wins from 20, with heavy defeats at Brighton and against Newcastle in their last few league outings. Their away form in particular has been a struggle this season.
Palace's away form has been especially poor, and that's the bigger concern heading into this one.
Comparative Team Statistics: Chelsea vs Crystal Palace

History favours the hosts
The head-to-head record over recent seasons leans heavily towards Chelsea, including a 3-1 win at Selhurst Park back in January and a goalless draw at Stamford Bridge last August. Chelsea have also won several of the earlier meetings in this long rivalry by more than one goal.
| League | Home | Away | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premier League | Crystal Palace | Chelsea | 25.01.2026 | 1-3 |
| Premier League | Chelsea | Crystal Palace | 17.08.2025 | 0-0 |
| Premier League | Crystal Palace | Chelsea | 04.01.2025 | 1-1 |
| Premier League | Chelsea | Crystal Palace | 01.09.2024 | 1-1 |
| Premier League | Crystal Palace | Chelsea | 12.02.2024 | 1-3 |
| Premier League | Chelsea | Crystal Palace | 27.12.2023 | 2-1 |
| Premier League | Chelsea | Crystal Palace | 15.01.2023 | 1-0 |
| Premier League | Crystal Palace | Chelsea | 01.10.2022 | 1-2 |
| FA Cup | Chelsea | Crystal Palace | 17.04.2022 | 2-0 |
| Premier League | Crystal Palace | Chelsea | 19.02.2022 | 0-1 |
There have been a handful of tighter results and even a couple of Palace wins scattered through the history, so it's not a complete one-way street, but recent meetings have mostly gone Chelsea's way.
A big gap in the table
Chelsea are fourth with 16 points from nine games, winning five and losing just three. Palace are 18th with only seven points from the same number of matches, having lost six of their nine.
| № | Team | Played | Win | Draw | Loss | GF/GA | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Brighton | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 24/7 | 19 |
| 4 | Chelsea | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 19/15 | 16 |
| 5 | Liverpool | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 11/8 | 15 |
| 17 | Manchester United | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10/15 | 7 |
| 18 | Crystal Palace | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 9/21 | 7 |
| 19 | Nottingham Forest | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6/12 | 6 |
Palace's goal difference is particularly rough, conceding 21 while scoring only nine, which tells you where most of their points have gone missing.
This is a big gap on paper, with Chelsea the much stronger side by position and points.

Players making the difference
João Pedro has been involved in goals at both ends for Chelsea, with three goals and three assists in just four matches, while Cole Palmer and Rogers have also been contributing regularly in front of goal.
For Palace, Daichi Kamada has been their main creative outlet with three assists in five games, though Axel Disasi's recent red card in just three matches is a reminder of how fragile Palace's discipline has looked under pressure.
Squad lists and player details
Squad and player details
| Name | Country | Age | Position | Height | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Henderson | England | 36 | Midfielder | 182 | 78 |
| D. Welbeck | England | 35 | Attacker | 185 | 73 |
| Pedro Neto | Portugal | 26 | Attacker | 174 | 62 |
| E. Fernández | Argentina | 25 | Midfielder | 178 | 76 |
| João Pedro | Brazil | 25 | Attacker | 182 | 70 |
| Robert Sánchez | Spain | 28 | Goalkeeper | 197 | 90 |
| M. Rogers | England | 24 | Attacker | 187 | 80 |
| R. James | England | 26 | Midfielder | 182 | 82 |
| E. Martínez | Argentina | 34 | Goalkeeper | 195 | 88 |
| M. Lacroix | France | 26 | Defender | 190 | 88 |
| W. Fofana | France | 25 | Defender | 190 | 84 |
| M. Caicedo | Ecuador | 25 | Midfielder | 178 | 73 |
| L. Colwill | England | 23 | Defender | 187 | 83 |
| C. Palmer | England | 24 | Attacker | 189 | 76 |
| M. Gusto | France | 23 | Midfielder | 179 | 67 |
| T. Sharman-Lowe | England | 23 | Goalkeeper | 189 | 73 |
| Pep Chavarría | Spain | 28 | Defender | 174 | 72 |
| E. Emegha | Netherlands | 23 | Attacker | 195 | 82 |
| R. Lavia | Belgium | 22 | Midfielder | 181 | 76 |
| J. Bynoe-Gittens | England | 22 | Attacker | 175 | 70 |
| V. Barco | Argentina | 22 | Midfielder | 170 | 66 |
| M. Penders | Belgium | 21 | Goalkeeper | 200 | 95 |
| J. Hato | Netherlands | 20 | Midfielder | 182 | 76 |
| Joshua Kofi Acheampong | England | 20 | Defender | 184 | 75 |
| M. Palestra | Italy | 21 | Defender | 186 | 80 |
| Geovany Tcherno Quenda | Guinea-Bissau | 19 | Midfielder | 172 | 68 |
| A. Anselmino | Argentina | 21 | Defender | 186 | 83 |
| Estêvão | Brazil | 19 | Attacker | 176 | 62 |
| O. Subuloye | England | 18 | Defender | n/a | n/a |
| M. Nicoll-Jazuli | England | 16 | Midfielder | n/a | n/a |
| R. Watson | n/a | n/a | Midfielder | n/a | n/a |
| Name | Country | Age | Position | Height | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Nketiah | England | 27 | Attacker | 175 | 72 |
| J. Strand Larsen | Norway | 26 | Attacker | 193 | 79 |
| I. Sarr | Senegal | 28 | Attacker | 185 | 76 |
| J. Lerma | Colombia | 32 | Midfielder | 179 | 70 |
| T. Tomiyasu | Japan | 28 | Defender | 187 | 84 |
| D. Kamada | Japan | 30 | Midfielder | 184 | 76 |
| B. Chilwell | England | 29 | Defender | 178 | 77 |
| C. Doucouré | Mali | 26 | Midfielder | 180 | 73 |
| D. Muñoz | Colombia | 30 | Midfielder | 180 | 73 |
| W. Hughes | England | 31 | Midfielder | 185 | 74 |
| D. McNeil | England | 26 | Midfielder | 183 | 68 |
| D. Henderson | England | 29 | Goalkeeper | 188 | 85 |
| R. Matthews | England | 32 | Goalkeeper | 184 | 78 |
| A. Disasi | France | 28 | Defender | 190 cm | 83 kg |
| W. Benítez | Argentina | 33 | Goalkeeper | 191 | 91 |
| J. Mateta | France | 29 | Attacker | 192 | 88 |
| B. Sosa | Croatia | 28 | Defender | 187 | 79 |
| Q. Timber | Netherlands | 25 | Midfielder | 179 | 71 |
| C. Richards | USA | 26 | Defender | 188 | 87 |
| E. Guessand | France | 25 | Attacker | 185 | 79 |
| Óscar Mingueza | Spain | 27 | Defender | 184 | 75 |
| T. Mitchell | England | 27 | Midfielder | 175 | 68 |
| Yeremy Pino | Spain | 24 | Midfielder | 172 | 65 |
| C. Riad | Morocco | 23 | Defender | 186 | 78 |
| A. Wharton | England | 22 | Midfielder | 182 | 77 |
| D. Osorio | Chile | 22 | Midfielder | 182 | 72 |
| A. Khalaili | Israel | 22 | Midfielder | 183 | n/a |
| S. Williams | England | 19 | Midfielder | n/a | n/a |
| Z. Gozo | USA | 19 | Attacker | 170 | 63 |
| J. Canvot | France | 20 | Defender | 188 | 75 |
| H. Ahanor | Italy | 18 | Defender | 184 | 79 |
| D. Benamar | n/a | n/a | Defender | n/a | n/a |
| G. King | n/a | n/a | Defender | n/a | n/a |
| L. Benetton | n/a | n/a | Goalkeeper | n/a | n/a |
Everything in the data points towards Chelsea being favourites here, given their league position and recent home performances against Palace's leaky away form.
Without a market to weigh against that picture, though, there's nothing concrete to recommend, so we'll sit this one out rather than guess at a price.
