Vitoria host Chapecoense-sc in Brazil's Serie A. Vitoria have generally had a solid campaign and sit comfortably in mid-table, while Chapecoense have struggled for most of the season near the bottom.
Vitoria's form has actually cooled off recently, with defeats creeping back into their results. Chapecoense, despite their league position, have picked up some useful results of their own in the last few weeks.
Analysis updated .
Compare bookmakers
Recent form tells two different stories
Vitoria's longer sample reads well enough, with eight wins from twenty matches across competitions. But the last five have been rockier: a home defeat to Cruzeiro, a draw away at Mirassol, a win over Gremio, then back-to-back losses in the Copa do Brasil and away at Atletico-MG.
What could your bet return?
Potential returns include your stake. Odds may change.
Vitoria: 20 completed matches; Chapecoense-sc: 20 completed matches.
Vitoria
- Win
- 40% 8 / 20
- Draw
- 10% 2 / 20
- Loss
- 50% 10 / 20
- Scored
- 22
- Conceded
- 30
- Difference
- -8
Chapecoense-sc
- Win
- 25% 5 / 20
- Draw
- 30% 6 / 20
- Loss
- 45% 9 / 20
- Scored
- 23
- Conceded
- 32
- Difference
- -9
| League | Home | Away | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serie A | Vitoria | Cruzeiro | 20.09.2026 | 1-3 |
| Serie A | Mirassol | Vitoria | 13.09.2026 | 2-2 |
| Serie A | Vitoria | Gremio | 08.09.2026 | 1-0 |
| Copa Do Brasil | Vitoria | Vasco DA Gama | 03.09.2026 | 0-2 |
| Serie A | Atletico-MG | Vitoria | 30.08.2026 | 2-1 |
| Copa Do Brasil | Vasco DA Gama | Vitoria | 27.08.2026 | 1-0 |
| Serie A | Vitoria | Bahia | 23.08.2026 | 0-2 |
| Serie A | Vitoria | Botafogo | 17.08.2026 | 1-0 |
| Serie A | Flamengo | Vitoria | 10.08.2026 | 2-0 |
| Copa Do Brasil | Vitoria | Atletico Paranaense | 07.08.2026 | 4-0 |
| League | Home | Away | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friendlies Clubs | Atletico Nacional | Chapecoense-sc | 26.09.2026 | 1-1 |
| Serie A | Atletico-MG | Chapecoense-sc | 19.09.2026 | 1-1 |
| Serie A | Chapecoense-sc | Internacional | 12.09.2026 | 1-2 |
| Serie A | Corinthians | Chapecoense-sc | 07.09.2026 | 1-2 |
| Serie A | Gremio | Chapecoense-sc | 31.08.2026 | 3-1 |
| Serie A | Chapecoense-sc | Sao Paulo | 24.08.2026 | 1-0 |
| Serie A | Chapecoense-sc | Bahia | 16.08.2026 | 3-3 |
| Serie A | Coritiba | Chapecoense-sc | 09.08.2026 | 2-1 |
| Copa Do Brasil | Cruzeiro | Chapecoense-sc | 06.08.2026 | 2-0 |
| Copa Do Brasil | Chapecoense-sc | Cruzeiro | 03.08.2026 | 0-0 |
Chapecoense's overall numbers are much leaner, just five wins in twenty games. Their most recent run isn't as bleak as their table position suggests, though: a win at Corinthians, a home win over Sao Paulo, and a draw away at Atletico-MG sit alongside two defeats.
Neither side arrives with real momentum, which makes the pre-match favourite tag look less secure than it might.
Comparative Team Statistics: Vitoria vs Chapecoense-sc

History doesn't lean strongly either way
The two sides met as recently as April 2026, when Chapecoense held Vitoria to a 1-1 draw. Going further back, the meetings are spread across Serie A and Serie B, with results swinging both ways over the years.
| League | Home | Away | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serie A | Chapecoense-sc | Vitoria | 05.04.2026 | 1-1 |
| Serie B | Chapecoense-sc | Vitoria | 25.11.2023 | 3-1 |
| Serie B | Vitoria | Chapecoense-sc | 25.07.2023 | 1-0 |
| Serie B | Vitoria | Chapecoense-sc | 17.01.2021 | 0-0 |
| Serie B | Chapecoense-sc | Vitoria | 17.10.2020 | 1-1 |
| Serie A | Chapecoense-sc | Vitoria | 14.10.2018 | 0-1 |
| Serie A | Vitoria | Chapecoense-sc | 07.06.2018 | 1-0 |
| Serie A | Chapecoense-sc | Vitoria | 17.11.2017 | 2-1 |
| Serie A | Vitoria | Chapecoense-sc | 22.07.2017 | 1-2 |
| Serie A | Chapecoense-sc | Vitoria | 01.10.2016 | 1-4 |
There's no obvious pattern to lean on, given how much the competition level and both squads have changed across that stretch.
A clear gap in the table
Vitoria sit thirteenth with 33 points from 28 games, while Chapecoense are down in twentieth with just 18 points from 27.
| № | Team | Played | Win | Draw | Loss | GF/GA | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Botafogo | 28 | 9 | 8 | 11 | 41/45 | 35 |
| 13 | Vitoria | 28 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 28/42 | 33 |
| 14 | Corinthians | 28 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 29/32 | 32 |
| 18 | Internacional | 28 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 30/36 | 28 |
| 19 | Remo | 28 | 5 | 8 | 15 | 32/47 | 23 |
| 20 | Chapecoense-sc | 27 | 3 | 9 | 15 | 29/53 | 18 |
Chapecoense's goal difference is especially poor, having already shipped 53 goals this season. Vitoria's defence has had its own issues, conceding 42, but they've been scoring more often at the other end.
On paper this points gap is Vitoria's biggest asset heading into the game.
Injury notes and key men
Vitoria have a couple of question marks, with Marinho carrying an ankle issue and R. Ramos a knee concern, both listed as questionable. Rene has been their main source of goals this season, while Erick has supplied plenty of assists.
Chapecoense have several players marked as inactive and questionable, including Robert Conceicao and Marcos Vinicius, while Giovanni Augusto has been their main creative outlet from midfield.
Squad depth concerns affect both sides, so neither team news picture stands out as decisive.

What kind of game might this be?
Looking at both teams' recent matches, goals have come fairly steadily rather than in floods or droughts. Vitoria's games have averaged into the mid-twos for goals, and Chapecoense's into the high-twos, without many really high or really low scorelines standing out.
Match odds and squad lists
Squad and player details
| Name | Country | Age | Position | Height | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Brítez | Argentina | 34 | Defender | 178 | 72 |
| T. Pochettino | Argentina | 30 | Midfielder | 178 | 75 |
| Felipe Vieira | Brazil | 27 | Defender | 177 | 70 |
| Gabriel Baralhas | Brazil | 27 | Midfielder | 178 | 74 |
| Lucas Arcanjo | Brazil | 28 | Goalkeeper | n/a | n/a |
| Erick | Brazil | 28 | Forward | 173 | 63 |
| Renato Kayzer | Brazil | 30 | Attacker | 178 | 68 |
| Fabrício | Brazil | 25 | Attacker | 186 | n/a |
| Luan Cândido | Brazil | 25 | Defender | 184 | 76 |
| Cacá | Brazil | 27 | Defender | 187 | 77 |
| Osvaldo | Brazil | 39 | Forward | 169 | 62 |
| Marinho | Brazil | 36 | Attacker | 168 | 70 |
| R. López | Uruguay | 32 | Attacker | 192 | 85 |
| E. Martínez | Argentina | 32 | Midfielder | 169 | 67 |
| Walace | Brazil | 31 | Defender | 188 | 75 |
| Gabriel Vasconcelos | Brazil | 34 | Goalkeeper | 193 | 86 |
| Aitor Cantalapiedra | Spain | 30 | Attacker | 177 | 67 |
| Lucas Silva | Brazil | 27 | Forward | 184 | 80 |
| Neris | Brazil | 34 | Defender | 189 | 87 |
| Jamerson | Brazil | 28 | Defender | n/a | n/a |
| Name | Country | Age | Position | Height | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y. Bolasie | Congo DR | 37 | Forward | 188 | 84 |
| Higor Meritão | Brazil | 32 | Midfielder | n/a | n/a |
| Bruno Tubarão | Brazil | 31 | Defender | 180 | 70 |
| Rafael Thyere | Brazil | 33 | Defender | 190 | 84 |
| Rafael Santos | Brazil | 37 | Goalkeeper | 191 | 85 |
| Marcos Vinícius | Brazil | 29 | Defender | 176 | 80 |
| Victor Caetano | Brazil | 28 | Defender | 186 | 84 |
| Léo Vieira | Brazil | 36 | Goalkeeper | 193 | 77 |
| Bruno Pacheco | Brazil | 34 | Midfielder | 174 | 69 |
| Perotti | Brazil | 28 | Attacker | 186 | 78 |
| Yago Felipe | Brazil | 31 | Midfielder | 174 | 73 |
| Giovanni Augusto | Brazil | 37 | Midfielder | 175 | 70 |
| Marcinho | Brazil | 31 | Attacker | 176 | 72 |
| Heitor | Brazil | 25 | Defender | 175 cm | 75 kg |
| D. Borrero | Colombia | 24 | Midfielder | 180 | 66 |
| K. Ramírez | Uruguay | 32 | Attacker | 180 | 71 |
| Neto Pessoa | Brazil | 32 | Attacker | 178 | 73 |
| Everton | Brazil | 31 | Midfielder | 181 | 71 |
| Camilo | Brazil | 27 | Midfielder | 178 | 75 |
| W. Clar | Paraguay | 32 | Midfielder | 177 | 73 |
Vitoria's position in the table and their broader season numbers make them the obvious favourites here, and the market reflects that. But their recent form doesn't back that up as strongly as the price does, and Chapecoense have shown some fight in their last few matches.
With no clean head-to-head trend to lean on either, we're happy to sit this one out rather than force a selection.
