Kashima host Gamba Osaka in the J1 League. Kashima have generally had the better campaign so far, sitting comfortably above their visitors, while Gamba have found the season much tougher going.
Their recent head-to-head meetings tell a different story though, with plenty of draws and tight scorelines regardless of venue. That history is worth keeping in mind before assuming this one is straightforward.
Analysis updated .
Compare bookmakers
Recent form across all competitions
Kashima's last 20 matches, spanning J1, the Emperor Cup, the AFC Champions League Elite and a few friendlies, show a strong overall record with plenty of wins and some big scorelines, including a 7-1 and a couple of 5-0s. Their pure J1 results within that sample are more mixed, with defeats to Kawasaki Frontale, Kashiwa Reysol and Machida Zelvia dotted in among the good runs.
Kashima: 20 completed matches; Gamba Osaka: 20 completed matches.
Kashima
- Win
- 75% 15 / 20
- Draw
- 15% 3 / 20
- Loss
- 10% 2 / 20
- Scored
- 42
- Conceded
- 13
- Difference
- +29
Gamba Osaka
- Win
- 50% 10 / 20
- Draw
- 25% 5 / 20
- Loss
- 25% 5 / 20
- Scored
- 43
- Conceded
- 20
- Difference
- +23
| League | Home | Away | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emperor Cup | Kashima | Ventforet Kofu | 23.09.2026 | 3-1 |
| AFC Champions League Elite | Kashima | Newcastle Jets | 15.09.2026 | 7-1 |
| Emperor Cup | Kashima | Suzuka Unlimited | 26.08.2026 | 3-0 |
| Friendlies Clubs | Kashima | Vegalta Sendai | 15.07.2026 | 5-0 |
| J1 League | Kashima | Vissel Kobe | 06.06.2026 | 2-0 |
| J1 League | Vissel Kobe | Kashima | 30.05.2026 | 5-0 |
| J1 League | Kashima | FC Tokyo | 23.05.2026 | 1-0 |
| J1 League | JEF United Chiba | Kashima | 17.05.2026 | 0-2 |
| J1 League | Yokohama F. Marinos | Kashima | 10.05.2026 | 1-1 |
| J1 League | Kashima | Mito Hollyhock | 06.05.2026 | 3-0 |
| League | Home | Away | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emperor Cup | Gamba Osaka | Tokushima Vortis | 23.09.2026 | 5-0 |
| AFC Champions League Elite | Gamba Osaka | Công An Nhân Dân | 15.09.2026 | 4-1 |
| Emperor Cup | Gamba Osaka | Biwako Shiga | 26.08.2026 | 2-0 |
| AFC Champions League Elite | Gangwon FC | Gamba Osaka | 11.08.2026 | 0-1 |
| Friendlies Clubs | Kanazawa | Gamba Osaka | 24.07.2026 | 0-6 |
| Friendlies Clubs | Red Bull Salzburg | Gamba Osaka | 15.07.2026 | 0-3 |
| Friendlies Clubs | Sparta Praha | Gamba Osaka | 11.07.2026 | 3-0 |
| J1 League | Tokyo Verdy | Gamba Osaka | 06.06.2026 | 2-4 |
| J1 League | Gamba Osaka | Tokyo Verdy | 30.05.2026 | 1-1 |
| J1 League | Shimizu S-pulse | Gamba Osaka | 24.05.2026 | 1-2 |
Gamba Osaka's equivalent log is far more uneven. There are eye-catching cup wins, like the 5-0 over Tokushima Vortis and the 4-1 over Công An Nhân Dân, sitting alongside some heavy defeats in friendlies, including a 0-6 and a 0-3. Their J1 form within the same stretch has been patchy rather than poor, but nowhere near as consistent as Kashima's.
This form sample blends different competitions, so it should be read as a general form guide rather than a pure J1 league comparison.
Comparative Team Statistics: Kashima vs Gamba Osaka

A history of tight meetings
Looking back over the last several years, this fixture has rarely been one-sided. The most recent meeting finished 0-0, and before that Kashima won away from home, then another draw, then another away win for Kashima. Gamba's only win in that recent run came at their own ground.
| League | Home | Away | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J1 League | Kashima | Gamba Osaka | 05.10.2025 | 0-0 |
| J1 League | Gamba Osaka | Kashima | 31.05.2025 | 0-1 |
| J1 League | Kashima | Gamba Osaka | 26.06.2024 | 0-0 |
| J1 League | Gamba Osaka | Kashima | 28.04.2024 | 1-2 |
| J1 League | Gamba Osaka | Kashima | 24.06.2023 | 2-1 |
| J1 League | Kashima | Gamba Osaka | 29.04.2023 | 4-0 |
| J1 League | Kashima | Gamba Osaka | 05.11.2022 | 0-0 |
| Emperor Cup | Kashima | Gamba Osaka | 13.07.2022 | 2-0 |
| J-League Cup | Gamba Osaka | Kashima | 18.05.2022 | 1-3 |
| J-League Cup | Kashima | Gamba Osaka | 26.03.2022 | 4-1 |
There have been some wider-margin results further back, including a 4-0 and a couple of 3-1s, but the general pattern lately has been draws or narrow away wins rather than home teams dominating.
Given how tight recent meetings have been, the current league gap doesn't automatically guarantee a comfortable Kashima win.
Where they sit in J1
Kashima are 8th after eight J1 games, with four wins, a draw and three losses, and a healthy scoring return. Gamba Osaka are down in 16th from the same number of matches, with only one win and four defeats, and they've conceded more goals than they've scored.
| № | Team | Played | Win | Draw | Loss | GF/GA | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Kawasaki Frontale | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 16/12 | 13 |
| 8 | Kashima | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 17/16 | 13 |
| 9 | Fagiano Okayama | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 11/10 | 13 |
| 15 | V-varen Nagasaki | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10/15 | 8 |
| 16 | Gamba Osaka | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8/14 | 6 |
| 17 | Nagoya Grampus | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 7/14 | 6 |
That's a clear gap in the actual league table, separate from the wider form sample, and it lines up with the general sense that Kashima have had the steadier campaign.
Kashima's home advantage on paper looks solid, though they've also shipped 16 goals in just eight games, so they're not exactly watertight.

Key men to watch
Léo Ceará has been Kashima's standout attacking threat, with 10 goals in just 7 appearances in the data we have, a strong return by any measure. A. Čavrić adds further goal threat too, having scored 4 in 8.
On the Gamba side, the player information available is more about discipline than attack, with a couple of players carrying a red card each in a small sample of matches. That's not proof of suspensions for this game, just a note on their recent disciplinary record.
Squad lists and player details
Squad and player details
| Name | Country | Age | Position | Height | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Anzai | Japan | 31 | Defender | 172 | 64 |
| G. Shibasaki | Japan | 34 | Midfielder | 175 | 64 |
| N. Ueda | Japan | 31 | Defender | 186 | 79 |
| Matheus Bueno | Brazil | 28 | Midfielder | 178 | 72 |
| Léo Ceará | Brazil | 31 | Attacker | 178 | 78 |
| Élber | Brazil | 34 | Midfielder | 170 | 70 |
| R. Ogawa | Japan | 29 | Defender | 183 | 78 |
| K. Tagawa | Japan | 27 | Forward | 181 | 70 |
| K. Chinen | Japan | 31 | Midfielder | 177 | 73 |
| R. Hirose | Japan | 31 | Defender | 176 | 68 |
| I. Sekigawa | Japan | 26 | Defender | 182 | 72 |
| K. Misao | Japan | 30 | Midfielder | 181 | 73 |
| Y. Suzuki | Japan | 30 | Attacker | 182 | 75 |
| Y. Higuchi | Japan | 29 | Midfielder | 168 | 66 |
| R. Koike | Japan | 31 | Defender | 170 | 65 |
| Y. Kajikawa | Japan | 35 | Goalkeeper | 185 | 78 |
| Kim Tae-Hyeon | Korea Republic | 26 | Defender | 186 | 82 |
| Yan Matheus | Brazil | 28 | Forward | 170 | 71 |
| A. Čavrić | Serbia | 32 | Attacker | 186 | 82 |
| K. Chida | Japan | 31 | Defender | 185 | 80 |
| Name | Country | Age | Position | Height | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Higashiguchi | Japan | 40 | Goalkeeper | 184 | 78 |
| G. Miura | Japan | 31 | Defender | 183 | 77 |
| T. Usami | Japan | 34 | Midfielder | 178 | 69 |
| P. Max | Germany | 33 | Defender | 177 | 74 |
| S. Nakatani | Japan | 30 | Defender | 182 | 77 |
| S. Sasaki | Japan | 26 | Defender | 183 | 75 |
| R. Hatsuse | Japan | 29 | Defender | 180 | 70 |
| S. Kurata | Japan | 37 | Midfielder | 172 | 68 |
| R. Meshino | Japan | 28 | Forward | 171 | 68 |
| K. Okunuki | Japan | 27 | Midfielder | 171 | 61 |
| S. Fukuoka | Japan | 30 | Defender | 180 | 73 |
| T. Suzuki | Japan | 29 | Midfielder | 168 | 64 |
| T. Kishimoto | Japan | 29 | Defender | 174 | 66 |
| J. Ichimori | Japan | 35 | Goalkeeper | 182 | 77 |
| I. Jebali | Tunisia | 34 | Attacker | 182 | 84 |
| D. Hümmet | Türkiye | 30 | Attacker | 189 | 80 |
| R. Handa | Japan | 24 | Defender | 176 | 63 |
| S. Abe | Japan | 28 | Midfielder | 171 | 67 |
| K. Sumi | Japan | 24 | Attacker | 166 cm | 66 kg |
| S. Toyama | Japan | 24 | Attacker | 178 | 70 |
Kashima carry the stronger overall picture into this one, both in the league table and in general form, but nothing here points to a truly one-sided contest.
Without a market to assess, the sensible approach is to watch how the price reflects that gap rather than assume it in either direction.
